you must try ChatGPT today Dave Touretzky (08 Dec 2022 03:25 EST)
|
Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Jessie Jiang
(08 Dec 2022 04:14 EST)
|
Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Ken Kahn
(08 Dec 2022 05:10 EST)
|
Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Ed Chen
(08 Dec 2022 14:33 EST)
|
[UNCLASSIFIED] Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Finlay.McCall
(08 Dec 2022 17:42 EST)
|
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Ken Kahn
(08 Dec 2022 18:28 EST)
|
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Martin, Fred
(08 Dec 2022 18:38 EST)
|
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Stefania Druga
(08 Dec 2022 20:25 EST)
|
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] Re: [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Dave Touretzky
(10 Dec 2022 03:07 EST)
|
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Safinah Arshad Ali
(10 Dec 2022 14:09 EST)
|
Re: [UNCLASSIFIED] [AI4K12] you must try ChatGPT today
Rachelle Dené Poth
(18 Dec 2022 15:44 EST)
|
ChatGPT is a new chatbot released last week by OpenAI based on their GPT-3.5 large language model. (Stefania Druga referenced it in her message about generative AI for kids.) ChatGPT is astonishing. It can hold a conversation, write stories, write code in many different computer languages, solve analogies, answer questions about hypothetical situations, compose poetry, and more. The world has been going nuts over it, with over 1 million users signed up to play with it. You have to try it and show it to your students. Just follow this link: https://chat.openai.com/chat Here's a good New York Times article on the phenomenon: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/05/technology/chatgpt-ai-twitter.html This critical article in the Atlantic advises to "Treat it like a toy, not a tool." https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2022/12/chatgpt-openai-artificial-intelligence-writing-ethics/672386/ I think that's good advice. While ChatGPT is very adept at holding a conversation, a lot of what it says is utter nonsense. Lots of people have been pointing this out, but here are my own personal examples: - It claimed that the isotopes of neon were radioactive and listed their half lives. In reality, the three major isotopes of neon are all stable and have no half lives. It just made up those numbers! - When I asked it "Who is David Touretzky" it wrote a one-paragraph biography of me that correctly identified me as a professor of computer science at Carnegie Mellon, but the educational background and awards it attributed to me were completely fictitious. - It insisted that the cube root of -1 was i. That's obviously wrong, as i^3 = -i, not -1. I tried to have an argument with it about this, but I was unable to fully convince it that it was wrong. - When I asked it to write Lisp code to generate all permutations of the letters in the world JACKASS, it wrote code and showed me what the output should look like, but when I actually ran the code it produced garbage, not the desired result. - It insisted that the LamDA language model was created by OpenAI, when in reality it was created by Google. Despite its limitations, you can have a lot of fun with ChatGPT. I asked it to compose a version of The Three Little Pigs where the littlest pig was romantically involved with the wolf, and it did so. It wasn't a very good story, but the fact that it could do it at all is astonishing. We have not seen technology like this before. The implications of this technology are hard to grasp at this point. The dialog between humans and machines is about to get a lot more interesting. -- Dave